Legal Opinion

St. John v. Berry

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 7, 1901No. 12,520PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Reno district court; M. P. Simpson, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Cunningham, J. :

The defendant in error had judgment in the court below and the plaintiffs in error bring the same here for review. The defendants were, •on the 30th of January, 1897, and had been for sev.eral years prior thereto, engaged in the banking business in the city of Hutchinson, running a private hank known as the Bank of James St. John & Oo. Plaintiff was a depositor, holding at that time its certificate of deposit in the sum of $1000, and also having on general deposit $224. On that date James St. John & Oo. sold out their bank, with the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Southwick v. First National Bank of MemphisNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Romeyn v. SicklesNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. McKown v. FurgasonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  4. Romeyn v. . SicklesNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  5. Brown v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hutchinson Lumber & Planing-mill Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. Altwein v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API