Legal Opinion

Romeyn v. . Sickles

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1888PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] RUGER, Ch. J., reads for reversal and new trial.

All concur except ANDREWS, J., not voting.

Judgment reversed.

2Cited by19 opinions

  1. Simms v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  2. Biershenk v. StokesNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
  3. Shultz v. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1941
  4. Thomas v. GonzelasWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Sanford v. American District Tel. Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1895

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API