Legal Opinion
Keller v. SAIF Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 27, 2001No. 98-09663; A109170PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*80WOLLHEIM, J.
Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board, asserting that the Board erred in concluding that his claim for a work-related injury was barred as untimely. We conclude that the Board did not err and therefore affirm.
The facts are undisputed. Claimant twisted his ankle at work on October 23, 1997. He did not notify employer or seek medical attention because he thought that the injury was minor and would heal on its own. Employer was aware that claimant had injured his foot but did not know that the injury had occurred at work. Claimant continued to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Osborn v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Kambury v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Argonaut Insurance v. MockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Compensation of McNett v. Roy-Ladd Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Liles v. Damon Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Lopez v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. AngusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- AmSpec, LLC v. CalhounDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2022
- Keller v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001