Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Hogan Exploration, Inc. v. Placid Oil Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 3, 1983No. 82-532Published

1ConcurrenceStoker, Judge

I fully agree with the result reached in the majority opinion in this case. It may be going too far, however, to say that the relief by mandamus provided by LSA-R.S. 31:211 is available only when there is no adequate remedy at law or only when the law provides no relief by ordinary means. It is true that such language is employed in the case of State ex rel. Boykin v. Hope Producing Co., 167 So. 506 (La.App. 2nd Cir.1936) and in the Code of Civil Procedure, LSA-C.C.P. art. 3862. However, if the type of mandamus in question can never be used if relief by ordinary means is available, such a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mire v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966
  2. Mire v. HawkinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. State Ex Rel. Boykin v. Hope Producing Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. State Ex Rel. Brown v. United Gas Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  5. State Ex Rel. Superior Oil Co. v. Texas Gas Transmission Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API