Legal Opinion

Holliday v. Adams

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided September 23, 1970No. Civ. No. 13850PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

BLUMENFELD, District Judge.

Petitioners are prisoners at the Connecticut State Prison. At a joint jury trial in the state court Arthur Holliday was found guilty of assault with intent to kill and Albert C. Daniels was found guilty of being an accessory to that crime. During the trial, which dealt with an assault against one Ira Cumby, *445evidence of a second assault upon Cumby was admitted over petitioners’ objections. The second assault occurred the day before the trial was originally scheduled to begin, and the claim of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Foster v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harry J. Manning v. Jimmy H. Rose, Warden, Tennessee State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  2. Parker v. SwensonDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1971
  3. United States Ex Rel. Arthur Holliday and Albert C. Daniels v. Frederick E. Adams, Warden, Connecticut State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API