Legal Opinion

Barrett v. Rosecliff Realty Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 28, 1950PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs have moved for an order vacating and setting aside a judgment and bill of costs in the sum of $1,579.60 entered in behalf of the defendant on or about October 17, 1949, on the ground that a guardian ad litem is not liable for costs in an action brought on behalf of an infant.

This was a negligence action brought against defendant and upon a trial by jury a verdict was rendered in favor of defendant. Plaintiff Michael Barrett brought suit both individually and as guardian ad litem for the infant plaintiff Marilyn Barrett.

Plaintiffs now rnove to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. Sawyer Bros.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  2. Vernon Lumber Corp. v. Harcen Const. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1945
  3. O'Brien v. New York Edison Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Glassman Const. Co., Inc. v. Maryland City Plaza, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974
  2. Gandall ex rel. McCann v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1958
  3. Miron v. APCO Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API