Legal Opinion
Lane v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 12, 1982PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Joseph D. Mintz, J.
Defendant moves to dismiss plaintiffs’ first, second and third causes of action alleged in their complaint, on the grounds that they fail to state a cause of action. Plaintiffs’ first action is for damages based upon an alleged violation of the Debt Collection Procedures Act (General Business Law, art 29-H); plaintiffs’ second cause of action is for damages based upon an alleged violation of the Federal Debt Collection Practices Act (US Code, tit 15, § 1692 et seq.)\ plaintiffs’ third cause of action is for damages under the common law. In order to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Fischer v. MaloneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Williams v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Long v. Beneficial Finance Co. of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
3Cited by7 opinions
- Richard L. v. ArmonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Conboy v. at & T Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Citibank (South Dakota) N.A. v. SablicAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Deutsch v. Health Ins. Plan of Greater New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- CBS Inc. v. Arcane Visuals Ltd.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.