Legal Opinion

Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Hankel

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1985No. 83-933-DPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Attorney disciplinary proceeding; attorney’s license suspended.

For the appellant, Robert Eugene Hankel, there were briefs by Robert E. Hankel and Schoone, McManus, Han-kel, Ware & Fortune, S.C., Racine.

*391For the Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility there was a brief by Michael Ash and Godfrey & Kahn, S.C., Milwaukee.

This is an appeal from the referee’s recommendation that the license of Robert E. Hankel to practice law in Wisconsin be suspended for 90 days for unprofessional conduct and, further, that the reinstatement of his license be conditioned upon his filing sufficient proof…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Matter of Complaint Against SeraphimWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against CrandallWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Bridget E. BoyleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  3. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against WolfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  4. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against CrandallWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against HankelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API