Burkhart v. H.J. Heinz Co. (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.
{¶ 1} In this appeal, we are asked to clarify whether former testimony given by the claimant in a products liability lawsuit against asbestos manufacturers is admissible in a workers’ compensation lawsuit against the claimant’s employer alleging workplace exposure to asbestos.
{¶ 2} Donald Burkhart worked for H.J. Heinz Company, developed mesothelioma, and subsequently died. He had given deposition testimony in a products-liability action he had filed against various asbestos manufacturers, but he did not sue H.J. Heinz as part of that lawsuit. After he died, his wife, Mary Lou Burkhart, filed…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Rhodes v. City of New PhiladelphiaOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- Clay v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- State ex rel. Tyler v. AlexanderOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Summons v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1856
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Whitmer v. ZochowskiOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Verbillion v. Enon Sand & Gravel, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Bank of Am. v. BobovyikOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Cranford v. BuehrerOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- Ezzo v. EzzoOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.