Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 31, 1946No. 4142PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOBIE, Circuit Judge.

This case, arising under the federal income tax laws, is before us on the- appeal of R. Foster Reynolds (hereinafter called taxpayer) from a decision of the Tax Court of the United States, holding that the loss incurred by taxpayer from the sale of a piece of jewelry was deductible only to the extent of 50 per cent of the actual loss on the ground that this was a loss resulting from the sale of a capital asset under a transaction entered into for profit. The Tax Court denied the taxpayer’s claim that this loss was fully deductible as a loss incurred from a sale of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Helvering v. CliffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Commissioner v. HeiningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Helvering v. National Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Dobson v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Exposition Souvenir Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  2. Herwig v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
  3. Guthrie v. JonesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1947
  4. Trapp v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1948
  5. Gutowsky v. JonesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API