Woodside Assurance, Inc v. N. K. Resources, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EVELYN V. KEYES, Justice.
Appellant, Woodside Assurance, Inc. (Woodside), appeals from the trial court’s judgment that awarded excess cash proceeds from a tax foreclosure sale to appel-lee, N.K. Resources, Inc. (NKR). In three issues on appeal, Woodside argues that it was entitled to the excess proceeds because (1) it had a valid and higher priority claim to the excess proceeds than NKR; (2) NKR manipulated the tax foreclosure process; and (3) the statute of limitations did not bar its claims. We affirm.
Background
On May 31, 2001, various taxing units 1 filed suit against Lloyd Gibbs Jr.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Huie v. DeShazoTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Mercer v. Daoran Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Lozano v. Lozano, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
- Cadle Co. v. Butler, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- CA PARTNERS v. Spears, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
- Strauss v. Belt, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
- Ankus, L.L.C. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2020
- Arsenio Cantu v. Elbar Investments, Inc. and Tax Ease Funding, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2017
- CA Partners v. Marshall Spears and CitiFinancial, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.