Legal Opinion

United States v. Mercado-Rodriguez

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 16, 2017No. 16-20370 Summary CalendarPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jorge Eduardo Mercado-Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mercado-Rodríguez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. FloresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shannon v. VannoyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  2. Authorlee v. Franklin Parish Detention CenterDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2019
  3. Callaway v. MorrisDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2019
  4. LeBlanc v. AndersonDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2021
  5. Miranda v. MaddenDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API