Legal Opinion

Ohio Casualty Ins. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1975No. 74-318PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerbert, J.

This appeal involves the proper meaning of the term “regular use,” as used in appellant’s garage insurance policy issued to Greenwood Auto.

Appellant contends that this court should be guided by past decisions in which a use was found to be “regular” if it was frequent, steady or constant over a substantial period of time. See Kenney v. Employers’ Liability Assurance Corp. (1966), 5 Ohio St. 2d 131, 214 N. E. 2d 219; Oberdier v. Kennedy Ford (1970), 23 Ohio App. 2d 168, 261 N. E. 2d 348; Motorists Mutual Ins. Co. v. Sandford (1966), 8 Ohio App. 2d 259, 221 N. E. 2d 596. However, the above…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Home Indemnity Co. v. Village of PlymouthOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Lumbermens Mut. Casualty Co. v. PulsiferDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1941
  3. George B. Wallace Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Allstate Ins. v. BoggsOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Kenney v. Employees' Liability Assurance Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sanderson v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Hollman v. Permanent Gen. Assur. Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Sanderson v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Beverly v. Midwestern Indemnity Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Withrow v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API