Legal Opinion
ILINA v. Zickefoose
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided December 31, 2008No. Civil 3:07cv1490 (JBA)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
JANET BOND ARTERTON, District Judge.
Petitioner Viktoriya Ilina brings this action seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging the conditions of her confinement at FCI Dan-bury and alleging that she has been denied necessary medical care at that facility in violation of her Eighth Amendment rights. Respondent Donna Zickefoose, the warden at FCI Danbury, has moved to dismiss on the ground that the case is not cognizable in habeas and should instead be brought as a Bivens action. As explained below, the Court concludes that, in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Johnson v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Boumediene v. BushSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- WILWORDING Et Al. v. SWENSON, WARDENSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Calix v. PullenDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Cohen v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022
- Dimartino v. SageDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- Elleby v. BlinkenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Geritano v. AUSA Office for The E.D.N.Y.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.