Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Norman v. D'Alemberte

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1892PublishedCited by 8 opinions

This is a case of original jurisdiction. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion-

1Opinion of the Court

Mabry, J. :

This is an original proceeding in the court. The case made for relator in the alternative writ is, that he is a citizen of the State of Florida, residing at Pensacola, and for .the year prior to the first day of October, A. D. 1892, was engaged in the sale of malt and spirituous liquors in the 18th election district in the county of Escambia., said State; that prior to the expiration of his license on the first day of October, A. D. 1892, relator caused to be published in the Daily News of Pensacola, for the space of two weeks before a regular meeting of the Board of County…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex parte TheisenSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
  2. Nelson v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  3. State ex rel. Edwards v. County Commissioners of Sumter CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1886
  4. House v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1872
  5. State ex rel. Bash v. County CommissionersSupreme Court of Florida · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hubbard v. HolmesSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  2. Howland v. State ex rel. ZirklebachSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  3. Strickland v. KnightSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
  4. State ex rel. Walker v. StewartSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
  5. State v. LabordeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API