Legal Opinion
Campos v. Nail
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 30, 1994No. 93-15119PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
A class of aliens who sought political asylum brought this action in district court to challenge Immigration Judge William F. Nail, Jr.’s policy of denying changes of venue to asylum seekers who lacked a residence in the United States when originally detained. In a previous appeal, we held that the district court had jurisdiction to entertain the action. Campos v. Nail, 940 F.2d 495 (9th Cir.1991) (“Campos I”). On remand, the district court found that Judge Nail employed such a policy and held that the policy violated the applicants’ constitutional rights to due process.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Reno v. Catholic Social Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- McNary v. Haitian Refugee Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. ReichSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mohammed Abdul Malik v. Doris Meissner, Commissioner, Immigration and Naturalization Service and Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- SORIANOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1996
- Gabriel Espinoza-Gutierrez v. Richard C. Smith, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Campos v. NailCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Lesly De Nankervis v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020