Larry Corriz v. Emilio Naranjo, Steve Martinez, Canuto Martinez, and Rio Arriba County Sheriff's Department
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
This appeal primarily challenges a jury verdict for compensatory damages in a suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 as being so excessive as to require the grant of a new trial on the issue of damages. The facts recited herein are either uncontested or consistent with the jury’s verdict.
Plaintiff Larry Corriz, then 18 years of age, was driving his car to Santa Fe, New Mexico, on September 3, 1976, when he stopped to visit with two friends who were *894sitting in their parked car in an arroyo next to the road. Larry parked his car alongside theirs and the three conversed through the car…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Nixon v. HerndonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Memphis Community School District v. StachuraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bennie Lenard, Cross-Appellant v. Robert Argento & Joseph Sansone v. Village of Melrose ParkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp. v. Aspen Skiing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Paul S. Dopp v. Htp Corporation, Paul S. Dopp v. Htp Corporation, Paul S. Dopp v. Htp Corporation, Island Resorts, S.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Lavicky v. BurnettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.