Voss v. Netherlands Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentGarni, J.
I respectfully dissent and would deny the motion of CH Insurance Brokerage Services, Co., Inc. (defendant) for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint against it. At the outset, I note that I concur with my colleagues that “defendant’s own submission supports the contention that [Deborah Voss (plaintiff)] relied upon defendant’s expertise and assurance regarding the appropriate level of insurance to protect the corporate plaintiffs in the event of a loss.” Thus, I further concur with my colleagues that defendant failed to establish its entitlement to judgment dismissing the amended…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Murphy v. KuhnNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Metzger v. . &198tna Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Hoffend & Sons, Inc. v. Rose & Kiernan, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2006
- Baseball Office of the Commissioner v. Marsh & McLennan, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.