Legal Opinion

Cockran v. Nebeker

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1874PublishedCited by 20 opinions

From the Fountain Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.

Suit by the appellees, as indorsees, against the •appellants, as the maker and the payee and indorser of a promissory note payable in a bank in this State. The note was payable'six months after date, or before if made out of the sales of Drake’s Horse Hay Fork and Hay Carrier.

The defendant Cochran, the maker, answered in three paragraphs :

1. A general denial.

2. That when the note was executed it had a condition annexed thereto, that the same was not to be paid if sales of said machines were not made equal to the amount o.f the note within the time limited for the payment thereof; that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Grimes v. PiersolIndiana Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Greenfield Savings Bank v. StowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  2. Insurance Co. of North America v. BrimIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. State ex rel. Jackson Township v. BergIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Shuck v. State ex rel. CopeIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Palmer v. PoorIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API