Legal Opinion

CARDOSO

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1983No. ID 2952PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #2952 MATTER OF CARDOSO In Visa Petition Proceedings A-24577322 Decided by Board December 19, 1988 (1)To obtain a preference status for the beneficiary as his unmarried son under sec- tion 203(aX2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act,

8 U.S.C. §1153

(aX2) (1982), a petitioner must establish that the beneficiary qualified as his "child" within the meaning of sections 101(bX1) (A) or (C) of the Act,

8 U.S.C. §§ 1101

(bX1) (A) or (C) (1982). (2) Uhler the Republic of Cape Verde, Decree Law No 24/76 of September 25, 1976, "Laws on Marriage, Divorce and Filiation," effective…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. COKERBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1974
  2. CLAHARBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1981
  3. OBANDOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1977

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brandao v. Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  2. Miranda v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  3. GOORAHOOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1994
  4. BRENINZONBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API