Legal Opinion

GOORAHOO

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1994No. ID 3216PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #3216 MATTER OF GOORAHOO In Visa Petition Proceedings A 29879909 - Decided by Board February 9, 1994 (1) In order to obtain preference status for the beneficiary as his son pursuant to section 203(a)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1153(a)(2) (1988), a petitioner must establish that the beneficiary qualifies or once qualified as his "child" within the meaning of section 101(b)(I) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(b)(I) (1988). (2) When the country where a child is born eliminates all legal distinctions between illegitimate and legitimate children, all natural…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lau v. KileyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  2. COKERBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1974
  3. CLAHARBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1981
  4. KUBICKABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1972
  5. HERNANDEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. CROSSBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2015
  2. HINESBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2008
  3. ROWEBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2006
  4. Gorsira v. LoyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API