Legal Opinion
Cincinnati Milacron Industries, Inc. v. Aqua Dyne, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 24, 1984No. C-1-84-426PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR CHANGE OF VENUE AND MOTION TO DISMISS
CARL B. RUBIN, Chief Judge.
This diversity matter is before the Court pursuant to the Motion for Change of Venue (doc. no. 5) and Motion to Dismiss (doc. no. 6) filed by the defendant and opposed by plaintiff (doc. no. 7). For the following reasons, the motions are denied.
Cincinnati Milacron Industries, Inc. (“Milacron”) purchased a water pump from the defendant Aqua-Dyne, Inc. (“AQD”) as part of Milacron’s contractual obligations to supply a cleaning system for the Army’s armored tanks. AQD is engaged in the business of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company v. Aviation Office of America, Inc. International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Sky Technology Partners, LLC v. Midwest Research InstituteDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
- Roberts Metals, Inc. v. Florida Properties Marketing Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1991
- Mead Data Central, Inc. v. West Publishing Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1987
- Hanning v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.