Legal Opinion

Ehrlich v. Oxford Insurance

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 9, 1988No. C-88-4192-WWSPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WILLIAM W SCHWARZER, District Judge.

Plaintiff Matthew Ehrlich filed this action in California Superior Court, against the Oxford Insurance Company (“Oxford”), Capital Workshop Financial & Insurance Services (“Capital Workshop”), National Futures Association (“National”), and thirty fictitious Doe defendants. Oxford and Capital Workshop removed the action to this Court, claiming diversity jurisdiction. Plaintiff moves to remand on the ground that removal was improper because Capital Workshop is a California citizen and because of the Doe defendants.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Ehrlich is a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Gary Bryant v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Thornton v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1980

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Corinthia Louise Wilson v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Greer v. SkilcraftDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1989
  3. Righetti v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1989
  4. Coman v. International Playtex, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1989
  5. Phillips v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API