Legal Opinion

Tribolet v. Fowler

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1954No. 5823PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STANFORD, Justice.

On September 20, 1951, the parties to' this action entered into a written agreement reading in part as follows:

“Witnesseth: Party of the first part, for and in consideration hereinafter named, has this day granted, bargained and hereby sells and agrees to deliver f. o. b. cars at Buyers Option Casa Grande or Tucson, [certain cattle] * * *.”

An action was brought by Tribolet in the-county of Pinal in which he alleged that the defendant Fowler had failed, neglected, and refused to deliver the cattle. On February 11, 1952, Fowler filed a motion and. affidavit in the Pinal County…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Highway Motor Freight Lines v. SlaughterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Miles v. WrightArizona Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Weygandt v. LarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. State ex rel. Flambeau River Lumber Co. v. ReidWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Dee v. San Pedro, Los Angeles & S. L. R.Utah Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Massengill v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  2. Pride v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Jeter v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  4. Goff v. Superior Courts in and for Counties of Pima and MaricopaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  5. Turner v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API