Legal Opinion

City of Dayton v. Gigandet

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 25, 1992No. 13018PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant, Mary M. Gigandet, did not deny the trespass by entering and remaining, after notice, inside the premises of the Dayton Women’s Center at 1809 North Main Street in Dayton, Ohio, as a part of a group anti-abortion protest. Appellant admitted that she was repeatedly requested to leave by those in charge and by the police.

A complaint for criminal trespass was filed pursuant to Section 133.05(A)(3) of the General Ordinances of the City of Dayton in that she unlawfully, without privilege to do so, and recklessly remained on the premises after notice against unauthorized access or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Cox v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. State v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. City of Dayton v. S. S. Kresge Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926
  5. State v. PrinceOhio Court of Appeals · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WhiteOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Koss v. Kroger Co., 07ap-450 (6-5-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. KeatonOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. State v. HolmesHamilton County Municipal Court · 2004
  5. State v. Miller, Unpublished Decision (9-22-2000)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API