Legal Opinion

Rose v. O'Keefe

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1931No. 1263—5658PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeddy, J.

We adopt the following statement of the case made by the Court of Civil Appeals;

“Plaintiff in error R. W. O’Keefe owned property known as the ‘North Texas Building’ situated in the city of Dallas. The property was incumbered by a valid lien thereon to secure indebtedness amounting to more than $110,000. November 23, 1925, O’Keefe borrowed $36,500 of I. E. Rose, deceased husband of defendant in error, Mrs. Pauline Rose. At the time he borrowed the $36,500, O’Keefe made a promissory note to said I. E. Rose for $40,000, payable three years from its date (said November 23), and stipulating-for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gilliam v. AlfordTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Austin Fire Ins. Co. v. Adams-Childers Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  3. Stout, Goldsborough & Perry v. Ennis National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Young v. BlainTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  5. Cotton States Building Co. v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Webb v. JornsTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  2. New St. Anthony Hotel Co. v. PryorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Caswell v. SatterwhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  4. Bee Line Coaches v. FoltermanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  5. Bowers v. BowersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API