Legal Opinion

Vuoso v. Department of Consumer Protection, No. Cv 99-0267844 (Feb. 2, 2001)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided February 2, 2001No. CV 99-0267844Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

This case arises out of an administrative appeal filed by the plaintiff following an adverse ruling by the Commissioner of Consumer Protection (the "Commissioner") rendered on April 12, 1999. The Commissioner had initiated the administrative action against the plaintiff, Vuoso Enterprises, Inc., charging and ultimately finding that the plaintiff had violated the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, Connecticut General Statute (C.G.S.) section 42-10a et. seq. ("CUTPA"). The plaintiff appeals…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cheshire Mortgage Service, Inc. v. MontesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Jackson v. R. G. Whipple, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Haynes v. Yale-New Haven HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  4. Beverly Hills Concepts, Inc. v. Schatz & Schatz, Ribicoff & KotkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  5. Samperi v. Inland Wetlands AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API