Bryn Mawr Mining & Land Co. v. Hughett
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion
OPINION ON PETITION TO REHEAR.
The appellant has filed a petition to rehear and assigns as error the action of the court in declining to consider certain exhibits to the testimony of E. T. Scott for the reason that they were not preserved as evidence by a formal bill of exceptions nor by the method provided by the statute codified in Shannon’s Code, Section 4836A1 and 2. The absence of this evidence makes a break in the appellant’s title and it fails to connect and show a perfect title. The petitioner prefaces its remarks with a complaint that the court, of its own motion, struck this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nashville Railway & Light Co. v. MarlinTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
- Holder v. SwiftCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Nance v. ChesneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
- Helvering v. McDougalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Great Eastern Casualty Co. v. ParsonsTennessee Supreme Court · 1915