Legal Opinion

In Re Investigative Subpoenas

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 2009No. Docket 284993PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGleicher, J.

In this action arising from petitioner Grand Traverse County Prosecuting Attorney’s investigation of a potential violation of the Michigan Campaign Finance Act (MCFA), MCL 169.201 et seq., petitioner appeals as of right a circuit court order dismissing the case for lack of jurisdiction. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

I. UNDERLYING FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

On February 7, 2007, Acme Township conducted an election to determine whether to recall any township trustees. Approximately a year later, the prosecutor filed a petition in the circuit court seeking authorization to issue…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Genesee Prosecutor v. Genesee Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  3. MacOmb County Prosecutor v. MurphyMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  4. People v. HarperMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Etefia v. Credit Technologies, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. in Re Investigative SubpoenasMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  2. in Re Investigative SubpoenasMichigan Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API