Legal Opinion

Seeber v. Ebeling

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 1, 2006No. 94,666PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Green, J.:

In this medical malpractice action, Christopher Seeber appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Dr. John Ebeling. The trial court found that because no physician-patient relationship was created between Ebeling and Seeber, Seeber was unable to establish the duty element of his negligence claim. First, Seeber contends that independent of the duty that flows from a physician-patient relationship, Ebeling owed a duty to him under § 324A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts (1965) based on public policy considerations. Nevertheless, the uncontroverted…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hoover's Dairy, Inc. v. Mid-America Dairymen, Inc./Special Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  2. Bacon v. Mercy Hosp. of Ft. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  3. Schmeck v. City of ShawneeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  4. State Ex Rel. Stovall v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  5. Bonin v. VannamanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Talavera Ex Rel. Gonzalez v. WileyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  2. Miller v. Hutchinson Regional Med. CenterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2023
  3. Morgan v. Wesley Medical Center, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020
  4. Rowlette v. MortimerDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API