Legal Opinion
Gold Medal LLC v. USA Track & Field
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided May 11, 2016No. Civ. No. 6:16-cv-00092-MCPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
McSHANE, Judge:
Plaintiff Gold Medal LLC, doing business as Run Gum (“Run Gum”), brings this antitrust action against Defendants USA Track & Field (“USATF”) and the United States Olympic Committee (“USOC”). Plaintiff alleges that the Defendants’ policy forbidding athletes from competing at the *12222016 Olympic Trials in apparel bearing individual' sponsorship is an illegal restraint on trade under section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1. Defendants move to dismiss Run Gum’s complaint for failure to state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). Defendants argue four…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Silver v. New York Stock ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gold Medal LLC v. USA Track & FieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- REX - Real Estate Exchange Inc v. Zillow IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023