Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Barnhart
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 2, 2002No. CIV.A. 01-1410 (RMU)PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Remanding the Case to the Social Security Administration
URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court for a review of the final decision of the defendant, the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”), denying Trinita Jackson (“the claimant” or “the plaintiff’), Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under the Social Security Act (“the Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 1382. Before the court are the plaintiffs motion for judgment of reversal and the defendant’s motion for summary affir-mance. In the alternative, both parties ask the court to remand this case…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Barnhart v. WaltonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Helene Marcus v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Dale J. MacGREGOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary, Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Valere Poulin v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Banks v. ASTUREDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Brown v. BarnhartDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Brown v. BarnhartDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Nicholson v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Williams v. ColvinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.