State ex rel. Cleaveland v. Bond
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
HOUSER, Commissioner.
The question for decision is whether the hereinafter italicized portions of §§ 476.520 and 476.570, RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S., granting retirement benefits retroactively to judges who ceased to hold office between September 3, 1970 and September 28, 1971, the effective date of these sections, are unconstitutional as an attempt to grant public money to a private person, in violation of Mo.Const. Art. III, § 38(a), V.A.M.S., or an attempt to grant extra compensation after services have been rendered, in violation of Mo.Const. Art. III, §§ 38(a) and 39(3).
The question arose in the…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Matter of Mahon v. . Bd. of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Schack v. TrimbleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Mead v. Inhabitants of ActonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
- People ex rel. Kroner v. AbbottIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
- Bedford v. WhiteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Jackson v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- McClead v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Baumli v. Howard CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Smith v. CoffeySupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
- Sihnhold v. Missouri State Employees' Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.