Legal Opinion

District of Columbia v. McElligott

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 12, 1886No. 138PublishedCited by 47 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. .The declaration in this case was as follows: “The plaintiff sues'the defendant, a corporation duly organized in pursuance of law, for money due and payable to the plaintiff by the defendant^ for that the plaintiff was employed as a laborer by the defendant to do certain work for the defendant, to wit, digging gravel from a gravel-bank and loading certain carts with the same; that the defendant well knew that in doing…

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. .The declaration in this case was as follows: “The plaintiff sues'the defendant, a corporation duly organized in pursuance of law, for money due and payable to the plaintiff by the defendant^ for that the plaintiff was employed as a laborer by the defendant to do certain work for the defendant, to wit, digging gravel from a gravel-bank and loading certain carts with the same; that the defendant well knew that in doing said work it was necessary to provide a sufficient •number of men to enable those engaged as laborers on said Work to…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice HaklaN

delivered the opinion of the court.. This is a writ of error to reverse a judgment for the sum of $3000, which a jury found as damages for personal injuries sustained by McElligott, the defendant in error, who was plaintiff below, through the alleged negligence of the District of Columbia in its conduct of .certain public, work on which, at the time of such injuries, he' was engaged as a laborer in its em-' ployment.

It appears that one Smallwood, the supervisor of county roads, undertook the repair of a public highway by the use of material obtained from a gravel bank. McElligott and one…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. District of Columbia v. WoodburySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Kane v. Northern Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Rogers v. LeydenIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. St. Louis Cordage Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API