Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Foxcroft Townhome Owners Ass'n v. Hoffman Rosner Corp.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1983No. 56736Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Simon

I concur in the majority’s treatment of count III of the amended complaint, but I dissent from the majority’s decision that the plaintiffs waived any right to appeal the trial court’s dismissal of portions of the original complaint. The rules of waiver are based primarily on a theory of abandonment. As the majority notes, in many cases a party manifests an intention to abandon a claim by filing an amended pleading which makes no reference to a claim dismissed from an earlier pleading. (Bowman v. County of Lake (1963), 29 Ill. 2d 268, 272.) But pleading over is not a waiver when the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Redarowicz v. OhlendorfIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Bowman v. County of LakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Field Surgical Associates, Ltd. v. ShadabAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  4. Foxcroft Townhome Owners Ass'n v. Hoffman Rosner Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API