Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Haverly

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 10, 1922PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Laurel Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clarke

Reversing.

The infant appellee, suing by his nest friend, instituted this action against the appellant, Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company, to recover damjages for injuries sustained in the defendant -company’s yards at Corbin, Kentucky, in the month of October, 1918.

Upon the ground that the alleged negligence arose out of the operation of its railroad by the Director General of Railroads under the Federal 'Control Act and that it was therefore not liable for the alleged negligence and injury, the defendant company filed a motion to dismiss and a *153demurrer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  2. Mitchell v. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  2. Blackburn v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API