Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Crane

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 5, 1934No. Crim. No. 2512Published

1Concurrence

CONREY, P. J., Concurring.

I concur in the judgment. The instruction given to the jury, relating to the evidence *718of reputation of the defendants “for truth, honesty and integrity and for peace and quiet”, is criticised by appellants, because the court, after stating (in language to which no objection is made), the rule concerning the application of such evidence to the case, further instructed the jury as follows: “However, if you are satisfied to a moral certainty and beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendants or either of them is guilty as charged in the information herein, it will be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. People v. ErnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. People v. EllisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. People v. GoodwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API