Legal Opinion

Saenz v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 19, 1955No. 27076PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON STATE’S second motion for rehearing

WOODLEY, Judge.

Appellate judges, whose duty it is to pass upon the claimed errors of others, should be the first to acknowledge their own.

Being convinced that we were in error in reversing this conviction and in overruling the state’s first motion for rehearing, both opinions are now withdrawn, and the following substituted therefor.

Mary Saenz was charged by complaint and information with the theft of certain ladies’ wearing apparel, to-wit: one two-piece suit of the value of $24.00, one sweater of the value of $17.95, and one billfold of the value of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
  2. Heard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schultze v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1982
  2. Brock v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Cedillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API