Cedillo v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIS, Commissioner.
This is an out-of-time appeal1 from a conviction of robbery by assault. The punishment, enhanced under Article 63, Vernon’s Ann.P.C., life.
At the outset, the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction is challenged. Since the evidence is set forth in detail in the original opinion of this Court, Cedillo v. State, 171 Tex.Cr.R. 532, 352 S.W.2d 736, no further recitation will be made. In again reviewing the evidence, we note that appellant was positively identified as the robber and gave a written confession admitting the offense. We reject appellant’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Fisher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
- Ferrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Ash v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Aldrighetti v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Aldrighetti v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974