Campbell v. Parker-Hannifin Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLINE, P. J.
Plaintiff Elizabeth Rosemary Campbell and 19 other heirs of victims of a fatal airplane crash in Australia appeal from the trial court’s ruling granting summary judgment in favor of defendant Cessna Aircraft Company and staying the action as to defendants Parker-Hannifin Corporation, Instrument Pro, Inc., and Brent’s International, Inc., on grounds of forum non conveniens. Appellants contend the trial court abused its discretion in granting the forum non conveniens motion, and it erred in granting summary judgment for Cessna because there were triable issues of fact…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Lacey v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Stangvik v. Shiley Inc.California Supreme Court · 1991
- Cal-State Business Products & Services, Inc. v. RicohCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- WYDA Associates v. MernerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Pridgen v. Parker Hannifin Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Hatfield v. Halifax PLC & HBOS PLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Burroughs v. Precision Airmotive Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Mason v. Schweizer Aircraft Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2002
- Morris v. AGFA CORP.California Court of Appeal · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.