Legal Opinion

HARVEY v. ARMEL

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 22, 2025No. 2:22-cv-03766Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DERRICK HARVEY, Case No. 2:22-cv-03766-JDW v. ERIC ARMEL, et al., MEMORANDUM Derrick Harvey objects to Magistrate Judge Scott W. Reid’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), which recommends that I dismiss his Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”). The R&R also recommends that I decline to issue a certificate of appealability because he has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. I will adopt Judge Reid’s R&R because, after review, I conclude that the R&R identifies the issues…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Monge v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API