State v. Alangcas.
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
POLLACK, J.
Over the last fifteen years, states have struggled to address internet solicitation of minors because traditional attempt and solicitation statutes do not sufficiently address internet activity. 1 In response, “state legislatures have revised their criminal statutes to create a new species of crime called ‘Internet luring,’ or ‘enticement.’ ” 2 In 2002, Hawai'i enacted Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 707-756, electronic enticement of a child in the first degree, to deter crimes against minors by prohibiting the use of an electronic device to “lure a minor to…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ex parte IngramCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Omiya.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. King.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. Nicol.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017
- Umberger v. Department of Land and Natural Resources.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017