Legal Opinion

O'KEEFFE v. Snyder

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 27, 1979PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

170 N.J. Super. 75 (1979)

405 A.2d 840

GEORGIA O'KEEFFE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

BARRY SNYDER, D/B/A PRINCETON GALLERY OF FINE ART, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT,

v.

ULRICH A. FRANK, THIRD-PARTY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued May 21, 1979.

Decided July 27, 1979.

Before Judges FRITZ, BISCHOFF and MORGAN.

Mr. Roger A. Lowenstein argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Lowenstein, Sandler, Brochin, Kohl & Fisher, attorneys).

Mr. David A. Friedman argued the cause for respondent Barry Snyder, d/b/a Princeton Gallery of Fine Art (Messrs. Ridolfi and Friedman, attorneys).

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Lopez v. SwyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  2. Fernandi v. StrullySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  3. Brewer v. PorchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  4. Lightfoot v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. Weinstein v. BlanchardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. O'KEEFFE v. SnyderSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  2. Kunstsammlungen Zu Weimar v. ElicofonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1981
  3. Kunstsammlungen Zu Weimar v. ElicofonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  4. Kunstsammlungen Zu Weimar v. ElicofonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  5. In Re Hunt's Pier AssociatesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API