Michael Scott Carroll, II v. State

BURKE, Chief Justice.

[11] Appellant, Michael Carroll, II, challenges his convictions on two counts of first-degree sexual abuse of a minor and one count of second-degree sexual abuse of a minor. He claims that the district court erred in several evidentiary rulings, and asserts that the prosecutor engaged in misconduct. We find no merit in his claims, and affirm.

ISSUES

[12] Appellant raises four issues for our review, which we reordered to facilitate discussion:

1. Was evidence of Appellant's prior conviction for sexual assault improperly admitted?

Was evidence of the victim's prior sexual…