Legal Opinion
People v. Murray
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 7, 2016PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
April A. Newbauer, J.
The central issue presented in these motions is whether the *826defendant Katina Murray should be granted a protective order restricting the use of her DNA sample to the indictment before the court. For the reasons stated below, the court finds the defendant has demonstrated the propriety of such an order under the state statutory scheme.
Procedural History
On February 29, 2016, the People moved pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 240.40 (2) (b) (v) for an order directing the collection of a saliva sample from the defendant for the purpose of DNA analysis.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Maryland v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- In re of an Investigation into the Death of Jon L.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. JohnNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- People v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- The People v. Michael DiackNew York Court of Appeals · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Leslie v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Leslie v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2023
- Matter of Figueroa v. FabrizioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- Matter of Samy F. v. FabrizioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- People v. BrownNew York Supreme Court, New York County · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.