State v. Baker

The Chancellor,

delivering his opinion orally, concluded that the contempt was not made out. He held that the terms of the injunction were to be understood as the terms of the covenant were to be understood; that the purpose of the covenant was to be considered as being for the *51protection of the business which had been sold, to assure it from recapture by the defendant either in whole or in part, and that therefore any work the defendant did for the U-N-joy Company, even though he was paid for it, so long as he was not one of its proprietors, could not be said to have been in violation of the…