Legal Opinion
State v. Nouris
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided February 4, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
No question is raised by the defendants, concerning the issuance of the restraining order and its service upon them. The sole defense they make to the contempt charge is that they did not commit any acts which can in anywise be said to constitute a violation of the terms of the order.
The language of the order upon which the solicitors for the State rely as having been shown by the evidence to have been violated is, as follows:
“You * * * are hereby restrained from * * * in any manner
“(a) Coercing or compelling or attempting to coerce or compel by any species of threat,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Staley v. South Jersey Realty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
- Bullock Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
- State v. GilpinCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1817
- Accumulator Co. v. Consolidated Electric Storage Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Wilmington v. General Teamsters Local Union 326Supreme Court of Delaware · 1974
- State Ex Rel. Buckson v. MancariSupreme Court of Delaware · 1966
- State v. KleinCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1956
- State of Delaware v. KleinCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1956
- State v. BakerCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1933