Legal Opinion

Ciarpaglini v. Norwood

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 25, 2016No. 14-1588PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Robert B. Ciarpaglini, an Illinois Medicaid participant, challenges Illinois legislation that caps at four the number of prescriptions a Medicaid recipient can receive without prior approval within a thirty-day period. See 305 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/5-5.12(j). At the time he filed suit, he was subject to that legislation and alleged he was struggling to obtain his medications because of it. While his suit was pending, though, he was moved to a managed care program. As a result he is no longer subject to that cap.

The main dispute before us, though not the only…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. UWM Student Association v. Michael LovellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  2. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Flambeau, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  3. Chad Bullock v. Russel SimonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  4. Sweeney v. MadiganDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
  5. A L v. BestorDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2022

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API