Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 1, 2007No. 01C14878; A117728PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner seeks reconsideration of our decision in Ramirez v. State of Oregon, 212 Or App 446, 157 P3d 1290 (2007). On remand from the Supreme Court, we affirmed the post-conviction court’s denial of the petition for post-conviction relief. In his petition for reconsideration, petitioner contends that we erred by not addressing whether trial counsel was constitutionally inadequate at sentencing for failing to advocate for a sentence of less than 365 days. We allow reconsideration and adhere to our previous opinion.

All grounds for post-conviction relief must be stated in the original or an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rodriguez-Moreno v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. Pinnell v. PalmateerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. Ramirez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hayward v. BellequeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. Leyva-Grave-De-Peralta v. BlacketterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. Ogle v. NoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API