Legal Opinion

Clyne v. Bingham County

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1900PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from District Court, Bingham County, cites no authorities.

1Opinion of the CourtQuarles, J.

This is an apparent attempt on the part of the appellant to have a portion only of his quarterly statement or account as sheriff of Bingham county reviewed on appeal by the courts. The transcript in this ease is imperfect, meager, and merits severe criticism. In order to intelligently understand this cause as it comes before us, it is necessary to set forth the transcript at length. The transcript consists of twenty-five printed folios, which, after omitting title of court and of the action, is in words and figures as follows:

“Bingham County, Idaho, to D. H. Clyne, as Sheriff, Dr. “Hotel and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Yavapai County v. O'NeillArizona Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Reynolds v. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Eakin v. Nez Perces CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Stookey v. Board of County CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Corker v. PenceIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Gardner v. Blaine CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Marysville Mercantile Co. v. Home Fire InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Mills v. Board of County CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Humbird Lumber Co. v. Kootenai CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API